May 16, 2009
-
I somehow feel compelled to blog about the whole Miss California Carrie Prejean thing now. I wasn't going to, but there's one thing that's been bugging me about all this, and I just got to mark my opinion here. First off, I don't care that she spoke her mind about Gay Marriage at the Miss USA pageant. That was her choice, and she has the right to say that, because of you know, free speech and all. Don't care. All the people out there who are vilifying her for her stance on Gay Marriage, should simply just knock it off. It's all opinions and beliefs, so there's no need for people getting all heated about it, like some people already have. Speaking about people getting all heated up, there's the other side of this controversy who are up in arms defending Miss Prejean, saying how "she just spoke her mind," or "she has the right to say what she believes in." Yeah, that's pretty much what I'm saying right? That's where it should stop right? As things goes though, it's not that simple.
Just because Carrie Prejean was being "Biblically Correct" by publicly stating her stance on Gay Marriage, does not absolve her from all the other acts she has commited. She should not be the poster girl for Christianity, because she's simply a lying lier that lies. That first scandalous photo where she was topless, and she claimed it was the only one she took, and that she was 17 at the time? Lies. By now it's known she took a lot more of this risque photos, and she was in fact of legal age (according to former pageant sponsors). She even goes on to say that it wasn't semi-nude (violation for the pageant) because it was for a lingerie shoot. C'mon now, really? Then on the other pics where she actually showed nipple, she claims that it was "because of the wind." Really? You know what they say about "Once you start lying..." Let's not forget that she got a boob job too, to better her chances of winning the pageant. Vanity anyone? On a professional level, she has been ignoring a lot of her responsibilities as Miss California, which is why she almost lost the crown and sets a bad example for how people should treat their jobs. Good thing the person in charge of that decision (the one and only Donald Trump) liked Prejean's semi-nude photos ey?
Those are all facts from just a quick browse through the internet, and it just makes Carrie Prejean come off as your stereotypical pretty girl with questionable moral decisions that goes to parties all the time. Is that the kind of person you want representing your religion? Yet there are still tons of people out there defending all her faults, as if she was just being sabotaged or misjudged for her actions. Not only that, but they are using Christianity as the reason she should be defended. Stop that! It gives a bad name to Christianity, by trying to make excuses for this lying lier who lies. All the people defending Miss Prejean, should just stick with the Gay Marriage thing, and not go on defending her for all the other sins she's commited. That's simply embarassing.
Comments (1)
haha you know how that goes. pretty people get defended just for the sake of being pretty--i actually have no idea what she looks like/what race she is so i can't and won't say more.
Comments are closed.