April 14, 2010

April 13, 2010

  • So the Apple iPad has been out for a decent amount of time now. Well early adopters, how are you liking it?

    I've already said my piece about the iPad (http://patrick005.xanga.com/720900875/), and admit that I embrace this future that this tablet is suppose to usher us in... except for me it's looking like it's not going to be with the iPad. Ironic? Sure. The way the iPad is designed right now, the future where this media consumption device is suppose to replace photo albums, books, newspapers, magazines, portable music/video/game players, calendars, e-mail reader, maps, etc... is just not completely quite there yet. It's really close though, which the iPad is paving the way (although the Kindle took the first step). You won't believe how much I'm actually looking forward to that envisioned future. Just the thought of reading magazines and graphic novels on the iPad makes the possibilities look so incredible.

    One thing I've noticed about the iPad's presence is that more and more people are probably thinking the same thing I'm thinking. Do we really need a powerful computer anymore? The Operating Systems out now are pretty capable at running on computers that aren't *that* powerful. Most of us only really use our computers for the internet and office work. The only reason to get strong hardware for a computer is for gaming purposes or graphics intensive work. In all honesty, a device like the iPad could replace the traditional computer for some people in the future. Add a physical keyboard and increase the capabilities of the iPad (no USB at the moment? c'mon now), and you've got yourself the computer for the future.

    We're not there yet though, but oh is it getting close...

    So if I really don't pick up the iPad in the foreseeable future, maybe it'll be a Google Tablet, the Microsoft Courier, or the HP Slate? We'll see. Exciting times....

    Some links to check out...
    - http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20100331/apple-ipad-review/
    - http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/04/nyt-google-android-tablet-imminent/
    - http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/microsofts-courier-digital-journal-exclusive-pictures-and-de/
    - http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/hp-slate-makes-an-appearance-to-show-off-flash-stays-for-a-rock/

April 11, 2010

  • movies i've seen recently...

    Greenberg (2010)  B

    Several dialogue scenes in "Greenberg" have subtle but poignant tells that encompasses the overall theme to this story about how life can be very "directionless," especially when life seems to just pass you by. Co-written and directed by Noah Baumbach, this movie isn't exactly perfect or a traditionally told story, but it was done in a way where it effectively felt like I was a fly on the wall to what the characters on screen were doing or talking about. The movie intimately follows a period of time in the lives of the two primary characters, which are Greta Gerwig as the mid 20's kind but flawed Florence Marr, and Ben Stiller as the 40 years old grumpy somewhat sociopath Roger Greenberg. Kudos to both Gerwig and Stiller, who are really good in these roles. This movie focuses a lot on uneventful events like lunch dates, old friends reuniting, a party, to writing a complaint letter; which may seem slow for some to watch, but these small events are actually pretty huge and important to these character's lives. Well written and artistically directed, "Greenberg" is simply a good film about people and life in general.

    How To Train Your Dragon (2010)  A-

    Based on the Cressida Cowell book of the same name, "How To Train Your Dragon" excels as a very well made animated film. The story is about a viking boy named Hiccup as voice acted by Jay Baruchel, who is a social outcast among his peers, but befriends the exact creatures that his people usually try and kill. Dragons. This is the main charm of the film, Hiccup learns more about and relates to these dragons who are pretty misunderstood creatures (like himself). Hiccup becomes close to one particular dragon that he named "Toothless," which has got to be one of the best animated characters around. Just the way this movie as directed by Dean DeBlois and Chris Sanders was able to make Toothless so believable is a huge achievement. Despite the typically predictable plot, and the somewhat forgettable supporting characters, this movie is very enjoyable to watch. From the well paced story, the excellent animation that is able to bring incredible flying sequences on the screen (watch this in 3D if you can), to the simple but effective and heartwarming "boy and his pet" aspect of the film, "How To Train Your Dragon" is a definite must-see.

    Clash Of The Titans (2010)  C-

    Director Louis Leterrier was in charge of this "Clash Of The Titans" remake, and what we got here is an overall very pedestrian film. This has the typical uninspired but serviceable story, the unremarkable but known characters, and the obvious CGI effects. It was as if they wanted to do a high budget "B" movie, as a sort of homage to the original film from 1981. Unlike that film though, this remake lacked any kind of charm to make it really worth watching. They tried to make this feel epic in scope, but I didn't get that at all. The action also wasn't that great either. They tried to add some humor in this, but the comedy fell flat. At one point in the story, they even added a "Chewbacca" type character to the group of adventurers, which I thought was a ridiculous attempt at some fun. Even actors I wanted to see, such as Sam Worthington, Liam Neeson, Ralph Fiennes, and Gemma Arterton were all wasted in their poorly written roles. "Clash Of The Titans" may as well have been a TV movie that was playing on the background while you're doing something else. Mildly worth the time to watch.

    Alice In Wonderland (2010)  B-

    I've always been a fan of the original Lewis Carroll tale that "Alice In Wonderland" is adapted from, and at the hands of director Tim Burton, I was expecting something absolutely off-kilter with imaginative imagery. That's what I imagined an Alice In Wonderland movie should be, and the results of this film kinda lived up to that expectation. Many characters and plot turns in this movie are pretty random and nonsensical, which might come off as overbearingly too odd, even though that is the theme and spirit to this direction of the story. Because of that however, this movie is most likely not for everybody to enjoy. Mia Wasikowska as Alice is very good here though, playing a character that acts unsurprised by the bizarre events of the film, because she believes it to be a dream. As the story progresses, she embraces her situation in this world and her character learns a valuable lesson. Johnny Depp and Helena Bonham Carter were also fine in this. "Alice In Wonderland" should be seen more like a thrill-ride more than anything, because to try and make sense of this direction will just be a mistake.

  • - so there was an earthquake in SoCal 1hr ago? - http://bit.ly/dnA77J - Didn't feel it, I was on the road. Just like the last earthquake, LOL

    - Woot! I got a new nephew as of 8:07 this morning of April 5. Congrats to my Bro and Sis-in-Law. I'm an uncle again!

    - Rob Pattinson actually said that his acoustic guitar is his only friend? The only response to that is EFF YOOUU Mr Celebrity Emo Heartrob =P

    - Distended Warranty's "iHate Therefore iPad" Music Video - http://bit.ly/cvtf3O (via @kpereira) - LOL woot! m/ -_- m/

    - http://bit.ly/8Zy5JQ - A hoodie for swimsuits? Impractical much? What is this, swimwear for emo chicks? Fashion fail

    - http://twitpic.com/1du197 - aww I saw a couple of ducks at my work's parking lot *quack quack*

    - eerrr, I've been getting distracted so easily lately. Maybe I actually have ADD?

    - I'm done with Jury Duty for 2010, and all it took was five phone calls! Didn't think I would get the best case scenario, but whatdoyouknow?

    - http://bit.ly/93z0Pz - Holy Crap Kevin of the Kevin & Bean Show. This Ke$ha parody video was hilarious and DISTURBING to watch.

    - First time at the Laemmle Claremont 5. Am I the only one that feels a little excited about being in a movie theater that's new to me?

    - Wasn't my imagination, there WAS an earthquake almost a half an hour ago. It wasn't that strong at my place though - http://bit.ly/cfS0NG

    - The song list for "Green Day : Rock Band" looks pretty good - http://bit.ly/bUwcJy

    https://twitter.com/albert5x5

April 8, 2010

  • What would you do with a time machine?
    That was one of the topics from the Kevin & Bean show recently (*click here to listen to that segment*), brought up because of the movie "Hot Tub Time Machine." As far as topics go, I actually think about this question a lot. Time travel has always been something I'm easily fascinated by, and I usually have a soft spot for books, movies, or TV shows that deal with this subject. Ignoring all the "butterfly effects" or "altering reality" dangerous stuff usually associated with this, who wouldn't want to travel through time? I would guess that there are usually four primary reasons to do time travel. Money. Sex. Changing History. Observing Historical figures/events. This all applies to the idea of going BACK in time and not forward.

    Making lots of money seems to be a given to many. You can invent something you know will sell well, gamble on sports that you already know the results to, or buy stock on an upcoming company that you know will hit it big. Sounds like an easy thing to do right? Maybe. I'm a little skeptical that things will really be that easy, considering that this is already a hypothetical situation where the past has changed. So wouldn't that mean that certain inventions, sports results, or successful companies in the stock market could change too?

    Sex is a big motivator for many, and in many cases it also has to do with romance. The opportunity to have sex with people you aren't having sex with now seems to be a big thing. People talk about going to the sex liberated eras of the past. That kind of thing. Sometimes it could be as simple as changing history to be in love with somebody else.... to have sex with. It's a simple wish fulfillment to try, but it doesn't necessarily mean it'll get a happy ending.

    Changing history is something people talk about as a possible thing to do, usually involving an act to prevent something disastrous from happening. Terrorist attacks. A murder. Altering the results of a war. It's a noble sentiment to do, but I fall under the thinking that things like that are too huge to change. Yeah, it'll be nice if "Sept 11" never happened or JFK survived the assassination, but who is to say what's going to happen to the world from there. You might think things will be better, but how do you really know that?

    Observing history seems to be the safest thing to do as an option. Going back in time to witness historical events or meeting historical figures. Not really changing the past, but just experiencing it. This is the option I can see actually happening if time travel was regulated by the government or a controlling entity that is trying to preserve the "space-time continuum" or what not. Seems like the most responsible choice to make at least.

    Me however, I've toyed with the idea of going back to the first time I arrived in the USA, way back in 1990. I'll literally change how I handled middle school, high school, college, etc... basically start all over again from that point in my life. Of course this follows the idea that I'll be time traveling into my body in the past, with my knowledge from today, and not my present me being in a completely separate body (although that brings about other options). The downside here is that, why would I want to go back to *that* time of my life. Reliving middle school and high school again? Really now? No, maybe that really isn't the option I would choose after all.

    In all honesty, I'll probably choose the responsible option of just observing history. However if I had the option of going to the future, I would most definitely choose that! Hopefully it's a great future with Star Trek's technology and philosophy, and not a dystopian future where bad things happen. Either way, it would be nice to travel through time.

April 7, 2010

April 6, 2010

  • Why isn't Ticketmaster considered a monopoly yet? Especially after they gobbled up LiveNation? Just look at one of my recent ticket orders...

    Marie Digby
    Ticket Price US $10.00 x 1
    Facility Charge US $1.00 x 1
    Convenience Charge US $5.00 x 1

    Order Processing Fee US $4.80

    Standard Mail: Allow 10 to 14 days for delivery US $4.00
    TOTAL CHARGES US $24.80

    c'mon, is that right? The final total is twice the price of the ticket cost! I understand the "facility charge," I question the price of the "convenience charge" and wonder why the "order processing fee" is separate from that because isn't that the same thing? Plus I thought standard mail delivery has always been free, especially considering that they charge us money to print our own ticket using our own printer and paper. The alternative would have been for me to drive 300 miles round trip to keep the ticket price at $10.

    If you look at these other purchases below, you'll notice that the convenience charge changes, and some fees doesn't always apply to some tickets, which only adds more questions to all these service costs. The merger with LiveNation is suppose to promise cheaper tickets and fees, but this looks like the same old questionable ticketmaster practices. It'll be nice if we have better alternatives, but that isn't the case for a lot of venues.

    Russell Brand
    Ticket Price US $40.00 x 1
    Convenience Charge US $9.00 x 1
    Order Processing Fee US $4.80
    Standard Mail: Allow 10 to 14 days for delivery US $4.00
    TOTAL CHARGES US $57.80

    Conan O Brien

    Ticket Price US $59.50 x 1
    Convenience Charge US $14.40 x 1
    Standard Mail: Allow 10 to 14 days for delivery No Charge
    TOTAL CHARGES US $73.90

    Warped Tour

    Ticket Price US $33.00 x 1
    Facility Charge US $1.32 x 1
    Convenience Charge US $6.85 x 1
    Order Processing Fee US $5.90
    Standard Mail: Allow 10 to 14 days for delivery No Charge
    TOTAL CHARGES US $47.07