March 25, 2010

  • So I was listening to the Kevin & Bean show and a topic came up that caught me off-guard. Apparently there's a backlash against the U.S. Census? There's an actual movement to NOT fill out the census form? You know the form that can help your community get it's fair share of funding for the things it needs - like better schools, hospitals, roads, etc... Is that not something people want to have? What's going on? Why is this even an issue? Has there always been an issue about the census 10 years ago? 20 years? 50 years? I understand that the USA right now is knee deep in this stupid Democrats vs Republicans political B.S. but c'mon now. There is no government conspiracy involving the census, and this is not "more government intrusion." Does everyone think that the goverment is out to get them? Give me a break.

    Look, the census only has 10 main questions. Without going into too much detail, here they are listed below, for you to decide on whether this is a bad thing or not.

    1) How many people were living or staying in this residence on April 1, 2010?
    2) Were there any additional people staying here April 1, 2010 that you did not include in Question 1?
    3) Is this house, apartment, or mobile home - (owned, rented, etc....)
    4) What is your telephone number?
    5) What is Person 1's name?
    6) What is Person 1's sex?
    7) What is Person 1's age and date of birth?
    8) Is Person 1 of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin?
    9) What is Person 1's race?
    10) Does Person 1 sometimes live or stay somewhere else?
    * If more people were counted in Question 1, continue with Person 2's questions *

    Now does that look like such a big deal? For everybody who thinks the U.S. Census is just another step towards the end of the world. Get a grip of yourselves! Seriously now...

    You can listen to that particular Kevin & Bean segment here...
    - Why You Will Not Fill Out Your Census Form-2010-03-24-Listener Call-in.mp3

    How well is your community participating with the 2010 Census?
    - http://2010.census.gov/2010census/take10map/

March 24, 2010

March 23, 2010

  • At my place of work, per my Union contract, I am entitled one 15 minutes break, one 30 minutes break, and one more 15 minutes break, for an eight hours shift. Those breaks are divided roughly two hours apart, with a max of 2hrs59mins of work time between breaks, before the company gets a penalty for not giving me my "task-free period" on time. By the way, I should point out that restroom breaks are allowed to be taken whenever is necessary. In comparison, at my wife's work place, she gets one 1 hour break in the middle of her shift (restroom breaks are whenever as well). In theory, she *could* take a break whenever she feels like it, but usually only if her work load allows it (which is not usually the case).

    Between the comparisons, I suppose it depends on the person on which one is more preferable. Of course the ideal situation is that we get to take a break whenever we feel like it.

    This subject was brought up recently while I was eating lunch with my family. My Mom and sister-in-law chimed in that when they worked in the Philippines, they practically took a break every hour (or less)! For some employees, they took a smoke break at one point, then took a regular break in the next half hour. In some cases, some of them even took one or two hours breaks to go out shopping at the nearby mall. The caveat is that as long as they got their worked done, they were able to do so, but apparently their work was never busy enough for them NOT to take as many breaks as they want.

    Is my mom's and sister-in-law's situation the same case for other Asian countries, or other work places in general? I've always worked in places that had a strict set policy to when I could take my breaks, so I've never had that much freedom in break times before. Must be nice, but weird at the same time to be able to do.

March 21, 2010

  • There's one thing I'm a bit curious about, especially here in the states, and maybe even more specifically here in the United States west coast. With all the warnings and regulations regarding smoking in public that we are reminded more and more of each day, as well as the rising costs of cigarattes, I have to ask. Why are there still people starting up smoking cigarettes?

    Standard answers would be...
    - excuse to rebel against society
    - seen as a "rite of passage" to adulthood
    - peer pressure
    - it "looks cool"
    - suppose to "calm your nerves"
    - social used marijuana is still illegal

    Just based on that list, is there a real "legit" reason to start smoking? We're continually being taught that it's bad for us, as well as others due to second hand smoke. People who do smoke even say that it's a bad habit, so what's the deal? It's occasionally called the "cancer stick" for a reason.

    Well, there are other answers...
    - it's a cultural thing for some to take up smoking
    - you come from a society that openly accepts it (especially among Asian countries - generalizing here)
    - members of their family does it and the habit just passes on to the next generation
    - the ability to smoke is necessary for acting reasons
    - moderate use is not bad
    - it keeps you warm?

    So the answer to the question isn't completely black and white, especially when the cultural and societal thing is brought in. As I live in Southern California though, those cultural and society answers doesn't really apply too much here. Isn't there still too much hassle associated with smoking already as it is? Ralph Garman of the Kevin & Bean Show has once jokingly said that society legally allows people to be prejudice against smokers with all the rules and laws restricting when and where they can smoke. Not to mention the overall stigma that comes with being a smoker.

    Although I don't judge those who do smoke, it still baffles me a bit as why people bother taking up smoking. Why do I care? Well, I'd personally rather not have people smoke around me. Not a big fan of the smell and all that. See, and there ya go...

March 20, 2010

March 18, 2010

  • Yesterday when I was driving to work, I ran over something on the freeway. I think it was either a muffler or a bumper. The car in front of me didn't avoid it himself, so I couldn't see it coming my way. There was a car to my left and my right, so I couldn't swerve. I was going at least 65MPH so there wasn't much I could do to avoid it in my situation, since breaking wouldn't made a difference at that point. So *thump* I ran whatever it was over. Luckily there wasn't any immediate change to how my car felt afterward. No sudden flat tire. No unusual sounds. Car didn't catch on fire. Nothing that extreme. My car seems to be driving normal.

    Five miles later, I make it to work and park my car at the parking lot. First thing I noticed was that my parking break was stiffer than normal. When I got out of my car, there was an obvious burning smell. The smell seems to be coming from the rear left of my car, so I'm assuming it has to do with the breaks. I looked down there and also noticed that I have a set of  wires exposed, as if whatever it was I ran over tore it's rubber covering (at least the metal/plastic covering was still intact). Didn't have time to do anything at that point as I needed to go to work.

    Eight hours later, I was able to drive my car home with no issue. Parking break feels normal when I applied it, but once I got out of the car, I noticed that burning smell again! I do not know what to make of it. Could it be my parking break is stuck on for one tire? I'm a bit annoyed that something like this could be happening to me. First my left leg was damaged, and now my car's rear left tire seems to be damaged. I lost mobility when I hurt my leg, and now my car might not be moving much because of this.

    I can't live without my car for obvious reasons. I still have one more night of work, so I'm hoping my car could keep going until I can get it in for maintenance on my day off. I'm guessing it might not be a quick (or cheap) fix either, so talk about my misfortune.

    Below are the photos of what I think the problem area is at...

    *edit* UPDATE - went ahead and brought it to the mechanic anyway. Turns out my "left rear control arm/link" plus cable was bent and damaged. My parking break was forced stuck as well, but they were able to unstuck it. Called for the parts needed for the repair, but I'm now able to drive it with no problems. Gonna wait for them to call me as to when they can fix the problem for a long term solution, and it's going to cost approximately $450+ total. bleah. At least I can still drive my car, so that makes me glad.

March 17, 2010

March 16, 2010

  • Movies I've seen recently...

    HALO Legends  (2010)  B

    If you are a fan of the mythological story of the "HALO" video game series, then you need to see "HALO Legends." This is an anime style anthology movie that comprises of seven stories based in this video game universe. These stories are considered canon to the mythology, so fans of the franchise really should check this out, as it fleshes many elements that were only briefly mentioned in the games. The animation of this film do vary in quality and style, from a moving painting look that "the duel" has, the more cartoony look of "Odd One Out," to the computer generated animation of "the package." Just about all the stories are well told, with several ones containing a lot of gravitas, involving tragedy, prejudice, social commentary, and of course heroism. "HALO Legends" is a well done movie for fans of the franchise, and although I understand that the stories are short because of the anthology nature, I actually wished that this project could have been longer.

    Justice League : Crisis On Two Earths  (2010)  B

    One of the many excitements that come from super hero comic books, is when the super heroes team up to fight a group of super villains. With "Justice League : Crisis On Two Earths," this premise is used, except with a twist. The villains in this story are mirror opposites of the heroes, as the plot revolves around a parallel universe where super heroes from "our" world could be villains in the other world, and vice-versa. This brings about some exciting match ups where we get to see how a character like Superman could turn out if he was a super villain, and watching Lex Luthor use his intelligence for good instead of evil. While this is a high concept story, the movie pretty much ends up being mostly about the action sequences, which unfortunately means that they cut some corners in fleshing out some of the plot elements. Keep in mind that "Crisis On Two Earths" also expects you to already be familiar with the characters, but the fans should definitely enjoy this.

    Planet Hulk  (2010)  B

    Based on the graphic novel story of the same name, "Planet Hulk" brings one of the strongest characters in Marvel comics; the Hulk, into an alien world somewhat resembling the gladiator days of ancient Rome. The first thing that should come to a movie goer's mind is that this is Ridley Scott's "Gladiator" retold with the Incredible Hulk as the main protagonist. Not entirely the same story, but the plot progresses in a similar fashion with a good portion of the movie showcasing the Hulk fighting it out in a gladiator arena, as well as involving a powerful and ruthless ruler. This movie is actually a pretty fun watch, and not just for the action sequences, but this story of heroism, rebellion, conspiracy, treachery, and whether the Hulk is just a monster or not, will keep you interested to seeing this through to the end. There are some plot points that take some suspension of disbelief, but "Planet Hulk" is overall a very entertaining animated movie. In fact, this is probably the best Hulk movie that's been made so far.

    Dante's Inferno  (2010)  C

    Adapting Dante Alighieri's epic poem "The Divine Comedy" into an action based animated feature isn't an easy task to do, although "Dante's Inferno" valiantly attempted it. This movie is actually more or less a promotional tie-in to the video game of the same name, and in doing so, this film does not completely feel well polished. The story is rather rushed for an 88 minutes feature, which is unfortunate as the representations of the nine circles of hell is very creative and imaginative here, that I wished they could have spent more time expanding on this journey. All this movie did was focus more on the action sequences; which really wasn't that great, plus the quality of the animation was all over the place. The most interesting story element here is paralleling the many sins that Dante has done in his time in the Crusades to the different circles of hell, but even that isn't completely well developed. "Dante's Inferno" is mildly enjoyable, but simply didn't live up to it's fascinating premise.

    The Girl Who Leapt Through Time  (2006)  A-

    If you had the ability to travel through time, what would you do? In the case of high school student Makoto Konno, it's apparently nothing too outlandish. If she didn't like her current dinner, she would just go back in time to when she had a better meal. Got caught off guard by a surprise test in school, she would just go back in time so she knew about it in advance. Teenage romance problems? Go back in time to fix it! That's the extent of creativity Makoto would use time travel for, and it's quite entertaining to watch. As the story progresses though, she starts noticing the the simplest changes she would make, would dramatically alter the present in unpredictable and most often unwanted ways. Eventually, this leads to a though provoking conclusion to the story. Filled with humor, drama, fantasy, and philosophical ideas, "The Girl Who Leapt Through Time" is simply one of the best time travel movies I've seen, dealing with the "butterfly effect" in creative ways. As an anime film, the story does have plot cliches mostly dealing with the teen romance aspect and some questions that are meant to never be answered. Overall though, I thought this was one of the best anime movies around.