Month: March 2009

  • R U Flirtatious, Fearless, Factual, or Friendly?

    You Are Factual
    You are highly intelligent, especially in areas that deal with concrete knowledge and facts.
    You are amazingly analytical. You can make sense of chaos without involving your emotions.

    If anything, you tend to be overly logical. It's sometimes hard for you to come to a decision, because you're too busy weighing all the options.
    People turn to you in times of trouble. They know that they can trust you to give good, well thought out advice.

    What I've been listening to lately...

    1) Anarbor - free your mind
    2) Breathe Carolina - its classy not classic
    3) Cute Is What We Aim For - rotation
    4) Every Avenue - shh just go with it
    5) Counting Crows - saturday nights & sunday mornings
    6) Various Artists - a punk tribute to metallica

  • Ever see an old friend or acquaintance, and when you greet them you end up not having anything to say? I would have said "no" to that answer, until half a day ago...

    Out in the public, I was walking one way (work related) and all of a sudden I noticed that the person walking the other way, but approaching me nearby is an old classmate of mine from High School. Now that's a long time ago, considering that I'm from the class of 1995, and I did not even bother to attend the ten year reunion. She was carrying a child and was with a man, but I went ahead and casually called out her name. I only called it out once, but she slowly realized somebody called her name, and gave me that look that says "wait, I know this person somehow." When she figured out who I was, I just said "hi, how's it going?" gave her a hug. She said "this is my boyfriend" pointing to the man she was with, I shook his hand. Then I said, "wow, it's been a long time hasn't it?" She agreed. Then I started to walk away and waved, so she said "okay, I'll see ya around," and she went on her way.

    That's it! That's all I did. What's wrong with me? What the heck was I thinking?!

    I should have at least exchanged information, maybe asked her who the child was, tell her what I was doing... Something. Anything. I knew her for four of those High School years, and all I did was greet her and walked away. I was freakin acting stupid meeting her, and that was embarrassingly rude. Admittedly I was on a schedule and needed to be somewhere, and it looked like to me that she did not have a lot of free time either, but that's no excuse. Did I mentally decide that I did not want the conversation to go on further, because "we were too busy for that?" I mean really now?
    > FACE-PALM SELF <

  • Can't say I'm surprised, but reviews for Watchmen have been all over the place. Everybody had different reasons as to why they loved it or hated it. What's hilarious was that some of those reasons were practically the total opposite of each others...

    "Not faithful enough to the graphic novel."
    "Much too faithful to the graphic novel."
    "Too much talking, not enough action, just boring." (told ya)
    "Kept my attention all the way through."
    "The soundtrack was all out of place."
    "I loved the soundtrack."
    "Didn't care enough for the characters."
    "I wanted to see more of the characters."
    "The pacing was really bad, and it was too long."
    "I wanted to see more, and wished it was longer."
    "Too complicated to follow."
    "I surprisingly found it easy to understand."

    However, there are four particular issues that some people have, that I see over and over again on the internet.
    - They changed the ending from the graphic novel.
    - The violence was much too graphic.
    - Too many scenes of seeing that blue glowing penis.
    - That sex scene was too long, and awkward. Plus the song sucked for it.

    I'm not going to elaborate on the ending. That's just pure preference, as to which one a person prefers. The movie or the graphic novel.

    The violence was definitely pretty graphic, but I chalk that up to them actually wanting to show Rated R quality action that you don't normally see in a PG-13 movie about Super Heroes. BTW, don't bring your kids to watch this movie.

    As a guy, I could live without seeing the naked blue guy's penis a lot of the time, but I understand why it's like that in the movie. Unless you are an immature person, the sight of a naked penis is not a breaking point for the movie.

    Then there's that one sex scene that a lot of people seems to be up in arms with. My question to that is WHY? How often do you see superheroes actually doing it on screen? There, that's the point I'm sure Zack Snyder intended. Just having the couple start to look like they are going to have sex, and then suddenly cut off to the next scene would be exactly what a PG-13 Watchmen would have done (nothing ground breaking there). As far as people claiming "that sex scene took too long," they would be exaggerating too much as it's really only a little more than a minute long. Also the song choice may not be the best, but it fit with the theme of what that guy must be saying in his head, as they are doing the act. Simply put, the sex scene did not break the movie. In fact, it was one of the hottest sex scenes I've seen in a movie for quite a while. If you felt uncomfortable watching a minute of soft porn on the big screen with a couple of hundred people in a theater, then that's your problem.

    There's this article online (link here) that expands on my point with the violence and sex and such...

    "And the other side of it is, you never see it in these types of movies. It's not just the nudity, but you never see it, and that's the thing with this script and this movie that you try to, without being presumptuous about it, the whole point of this comic, when it came out, was going as far as you can in that genre. I feel like that is what this movie does. It goes that far with violence, it should go that far with the love scenes, and that far with the language and that far with the humor. I think that's sort of the point of what you're aiming for, and I'd like to think that's what they were aiming for when they wrote the comic."

    On that note, it is of course okay to say that you do not like Watchmen because you thought it was boring. I admit that the trailers were very misleading into making people believe that it was going to be an action fest. It's no different than making a trailer of "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" containing nothing but action scenes, when the movie clearly is not like that. I try and tell people that Watchmen is clearly a character study film with a murder mystery plot to tie things together. I also emphasize how much talking there is in the movie, as opposed to action/adventure. Warner Bros wanted to get as much of their money back for the budget though, so they had to "trick" the uninitiated.

    However I'd like to also point out, that it's however wrong to think that just because you do not like Watchmen, it means that it IS a bad movie. Calling it boring is also an opinion and should not be stated as fact.

  • movies I've seen recently...


    Watchmen (2009)  A

    If you think that "Watchmen" looks like a typical super hero movie, then you'll be wrong. Just like the graphic novel of the same name that it was adapted from, this movie attempts to make people reconsider what a super hero movie can be. A noticeable point is the fact that for an almost three hours movie, there are surprisingly only a handful of action / adventure sequences, which people usually expect to see a lot of in a super hero flick. There's a lot more scenes involving people just talking, having philosophical discussions about morality and politics, which might just turn some people off. When there is violence however, it is graphic and in your face. Also one thing lacking in most super hero movies, is sex, which this film does not shy away from. "Watchmen" deserves it's R rating, and just because it has costumed characters, parents need to reconsider bringing their kids to see it

    To explain "Watchmen" can be hard to do, but it starts off simply enough like a murder mystery, with the masked vigilante Rorschach (wonderfully performed by Jackie Earle Haley) trying to figure out who killed The Comedian; who is another costumed character (played by Jeffrey Dean Morgan). That's just the basic story of the movie though, and what the film really becomes is a character study on who these costumed heroes are, and what makes them tick. This is done through a lot of flashback sequences, which along with the dense dialog, forces the viewer to really pay attention to what is being shown and said on screen, unless they want to feel lost. Considering how intricate the material is, the pacing to explain all these stories goes at a pretty nice speed, but the length of the film will take it's toll and it'll feel like you are watching a mini-series in one sitting. At least the visuals are easy on the eyes (except for President Nixon's makeup), especially the great work done on bringing Dr.Manhattan to life (well played by Billy Crudup). Speaking of easy on the eyes... Malin Akerman as Silk Spectre II... *ahem*

    What director Zack Snyder and screenplay writers David Hayter and Alex Tse have successfully done, is make "Watchmen" feel like a believable take of what the world could be like if Super Heroes do exist. Not only that, but the content of the story should also elicit some thoughts and discussions about some of the things said and done in the movie. "Watchmen" goes to show that just because a movie has characters wearing costumes to fight injustice, does not mean it has to only cater to a young audience. I'm hoping other movie makers takes note of this example.


    Wonder Woman (2009)  B

    While this "Wonder Woman" animated movie simply feels like a by the numbers origin story, there's a lot to be entertained by it. Primarily it's got to be the dialog by the characters on screen, backed by a strong voice cast from Keri Russell, Nathan Fillion, Virginia Madsen, to Alfred Molina. In particular I loved the banter between Wonder Woman and Steve Trevor, and the whole "man versus woman" conversations. The use of the golden lasso of truth has also proven to be a good device for some comedic moments. I also liked how the "tough guy" lines are being said by women in this one, which I found very humorous. The animation was also decently good, even though it's not "theatrical quality" great, but it definitely kept my attention. Sure there were moments that required me to suspend my disbelief, but they did not break the movie. "Wonder Woman" was simply a fun movie to watch, and I'm actually hoping for a sequel.


    Street Fighter : the Legend of Chun-Li (2009)  D+

    I shouldn't have been surprised, but "Street Fighter : The Legend of Chun-Li" was simply bad. Hilariously bad. The biggest mistake that director Andrzej Bartkowiak could have done, was to try and make this movie adaptation of a popular video game character seem realistic. The problem there is that the movie is overall unbelievable, filled with stupid plot points, and characters that do not work. Kristin Kreuk is pretty but is miscast as Chun-Li, and mention has to be made of Chris Klein who has got to have the worst case of over-acting that I've seen in a long time. I wished they would have just gone the campy way of things, because then it could have at least been fun to watch. If you are a fan of the Street Fighter games, only watch this for the curiosity factor and nothing else.

  • The film adaptation of the "un-filmable" graphic novel; Watchmen, is actually in movie theaters this weekend. It took a really long time for this to happen, especially since the source material was released in 1986. The big question now is whether a source material like Watchmen is capable of being a huge success as a movie, just like the book was. Honestly, I don't think anybody knows.

    In terms of general marketing, it looks like they are making it look appealing to the fantasy/sci-fi fans and those who were fans of superhero movies like "the Dark Knight," "Iron Man," "Spider-man," and "X-Men." Wait, that's just about everybody isn't it? But here lies the problem, compared to those other superheroes, Watchmen is actually a bit different. The easy answer is that it's a lot "more adult" than the others. "The Dark Knight" right now is the closest thing to a big budgeted super hero movie that can kinda be considered "more adult," but not when compared to the ambitious nature of Watchmen.  Considering that there are actually those out there who did not even appreciate the more serious take of a Batman film, it makes me question how those people are going to handle Watchmen?

    Are people prepared to watch a big budgeted superhero movie, when most don't even know who these heroes are? Are they open to the idea that this superhero flick has A LOT more scenes of people talking than flashy action sequences? Are people going to accept heroes who honestly don't really act like those noble and inspiring heroes that you are used to seeing? Are parents going to be happy of it being a comic book movie that's rated R and almost 3 hours long? With those in mind, the mainstream audience accepting Watchmen is definitely questionable.

    The only real guarantee right now are that the people familiar with the book will definitely be in theaters to see Watchmen. Of course the majority of them are very skeptical as to whether they'd like it in the first place, as a lot of them consider the book to be something sacred, with any alterations to it absolutely blashpemous. So I wouldn't be surprise if several of these die hard fans already have the mindset to be disappointed, before even going in the movie theater. My advice to them is to judge the movie as a movie first before comparing it to the book. Just try it, because I know that I have to do the same. If not, just watch "Watchmen : The Complete Motion Comic" DVD then.

    There is a question that most Watchmen fans are familiar with; "who watches the watchmen?" That was a thematic query for the book ("who polices the superheroes?"), but I guess now with the film, that question feels a lot more directed towards the movie goers out there. So are YOU going to watch the Watchmen?

  • What Kind of Superhero Would You Be?

    You Would Be a Upstanding Superhero
    You are alert and observant. You can see through people easily. You know who's evil and who's good.

    You get bored easily and need excitement in your life. You like having problems to solve.

    You understand people quite well and often know what others are thinking. Because of this, you can get people to do what you want.

    You are a shapeshifter who fits in with almost any group. You can get along with anyone. You're quite flexible.

    You are a true intellectual. You are thirsty for knowledge, and you are curious about the world.

    What I've been listening to lately...

    1) The Bird And The Bee - ray guns are not just the future
    2) U2 - no line on the horizon
    3) The Fray - the fray
    4) The Red Jumpsuit Apparatus - lonely road
    5) Marie Digby - unfold
    6) Hip-Hop Tribute To Metallica - the ultimate "mash-up"

  • Playing other people online on a video game console, has got to be one of the best things to happen in gaming this past decade. For years, it's always been a PC only thing, but then the Dreamcast started online competitive gaming on a console with just a 56k modem, which paved the way for current game consoles fully embracing it (except for the Wii). The First Person Shooter genre is ofcourse the one that supports online competition the most, but for me it's the fighting game genre that I prefer for my online battles. Throughout the years I've played online with fighting games like Capcom Vs SNK 2, Street Fighter 3rd Strike, and Virtua Fighter V, but now with the release of Street Fighter IV that's where most of my time is spent. The issue about online competition however is that it's unavoidably a world wide experience, which means that you'll meet other gamers from all over the world, who are either nice people or those who aren't so nice. The stereotype is that the majority of people online are a bunch of deucebags and jerks hiding behind the anonymity of the internet, and quite possibly some 13 year old boy. Sometimes it's preferable to just play with people you know, because it can be aggravating meeting a-holes out there.

    Recently, after what I thought was a pretty good competitive match online on Street Fighter IV, I decided to send a message to the other guy. This is how it went...

    optimum5 (me) : "nice"
    THELONEWEREWOLF (the other guy) : "NICE? SO U WANT ME 2 KICK YOUR ASS AGAIN?"
    optimum5 : "lol dude I was giving you a compliment idiot lol"
    THELONEWEREWOLF : "IDIOT?!" *trash talk censored for this blog post*
    optimum5 : "=P"

    Seriously now, that's the kind of conversation that happens more often than it should online. The all caps thing is something the guy did too, which I decided to keep here for show. Luckily there's a function "Avoid This Player" and "Block Communications" available for use on xbox LIVE, which I unsurprisingly applied to Mr. THELONEWEREWOLF dude, right after my smiley. I swear, people like him is what causes people like me to think twice about bothering to communicate with people online. Ofcourse there have been some pretty cool people I've met through xbox LIVE, all the way from the East Coast of the USA, to the UK, South America, and even Japan. Online gaming may not be perfect in the sense of a great social experience, but at least it exists.